The Specification Recipe for Construction Success

In the latest episode of What the RFI, host Matt Brennan dives deep into the critical role of Specifications in Construction with industry experts Steve Gantner and Dave Stutzman. Often overlooked, specifications serve as the foundation for successful construction projects, bridging the gap between design intent and execution. When written clearly and comprehensively, specifications minimize RFIs (Requests for Information), prevent costly mistakes, and ensure smooth project delivery.

Why Specifications Matter

Specifications act as a recipe for construction success, providing detailed guidance on materials, performance criteria, and workmanship expectations. Without well-crafted specifications, projects are prone to ambiguity, leading to misinterpretations, construction delays, and potential disputes.

Key takeaways from the discussion include:

  • Specifications should be tailored to each unique project. Reusing old specs without updates can introduce errors and outdated requirements.

  • Collaboration among all stakeholders is crucial. Architects, specifiers, contractors, and owners must work together to align expectations and clarify design intent.

  • Performance-based specifications are challenging but necessary. They require precise language to define desired outcomes while allowing for flexibility in material selection.

  • Vague specifications lead to RFIs and disputes. Lack of clarity often forces contractors to seek clarifications, which can delay progress and increase costs.

  • Avoid including quantities in specifications. This prevents conflicts with drawings and ensures accurate bidding.

The Challenges of Writing Effective Specifications

Writing specifications is not just about listing materials and procedures; it's about ensuring clarity, accuracy, and consistency. Common misconceptions in the industry include:

- “Every job is the same.” Each project has unique requirements that demand customized specifications.

- “It’s just like the last one.” Reusing past specifications without thorough review can lead to outdated or incorrect information.

- “Two letters made the difference.” Small changes in wording can have significant implications on project execution and safety.

To combat these challenges, the discussion emphasized best practices such as early involvement in the design process and using structured formats like Uniformat to capture project requirements effectively.

The Role of Technology in Specification Writing

While technology is revolutionizing many aspects of construction, AI tools are not yet reliable for creating specifications. The panel highlighted that:

  • AI-generated specifications often lack the nuance and expertise needed for complex projects.

  • Specification writing requires human judgment, experience, and an understanding of project-specific constraints.

  • Tools like Conspectus have been developed to enhance collaboration and improve the specification process, offering a structured approach that benefits architects and contractors alike.

Specifications vs. Drawings: Understanding Precedence

Another key discussion point was the precedence of specifications over drawings in contracts. In many cases, specifications should take priority to avoid conflicts and ensure design intent is clearly documented. The panel stressed that:

  • Tight specifications eliminate RFIs. Clearly defined requirements reduce ambiguity and prevent unnecessary back-and-forth inquiries.

  • Clear communication between architects and specifiers is vital. Misalignment in documentation can lead to costly revisions.

  • Public bidding processes limit control over specifications. Alternative specification formats may be needed to accommodate different project delivery methods.

Best Practices for Writing Specifications

To enhance specification quality and effectiveness, consider the following:

  1. Start early. Engaging specification writers in the early design phases leads to better coordination and fewer RFIs.

  2. Ensure clarity and brevity. Less is often more—overly complex specifications can introduce confusion.

  3. Keep product information current. Outdated product specifications can result in incompatible or unavailable materials.

  4. Use samples and submittals appropriately. They should be relevant and necessary, avoiding unnecessary submittal requirements.

  5. Understand the project context. Specifications must align with the owner’s needs, project goals, and site-specific constraints.

Conclusion

Specifications are the backbone of successful construction projects. By prioritizing clarity, collaboration, and proper documentation, architects and contractors can minimize RFIs, avoid costly mistakes, and ensure a seamless construction process. As Steve Gantner and Dave Stutzman emphasized, “Help us help you” by investing time in well-crafted specifications from the outset.

Tune into What the RFI for more insights into construction administration, and stay ahead of the curve in mastering the art of specifications!

Steve Gantner
Guest
Steve Gantner
RA, CSI, CCS, CCCA, SCIP, AGCMO
Dave Stutzman
Guest
Dave Stutzman
AIA, FCSI, CCS, SCIP, LEED AP